Sherman Travel - Boeing Dreamliner is Safe But One Former Employee Begs to Differ

In fact it maybe one of the strongest aircraft ever built as well as the most efficient, the structural integrity of the aircraft itself seems to not be an issue. In case the aircraft catches on fire, one former Boeing engineer believes that the Dreamliner may not be safe for passengers, unfortunately. Just in time to fight the Global War on Global Warming. Well the Boeing Dreamliner is the most efficient airliner ever created by mankind and indeed that means better performance and less fuel consumption.

Which most aircraft are built out of, what we do know about composites is that when used correctly there structural integrity is much better than aluminum, still. It will not last forever; one problem that the Online Think Tank looked into is that composites over time fatigues like anything else and we just do not have enough experience with it yet. They will make toxic smoke and that is a serious issue for any passengers on board, the Boeing engineer claims that if the composites burn.

Now the EU is asking for a sample of the composite material to do a test on it. I would take a grain of salt with any former employee opinions, so. Even making stuff up to slander the company, i have noticed a good number of former Boeing Employees union people completely trashing on the company, in fact, i do not side completely with the ex-Boeing engineer, and yet, if an aircraft catches fire, perhaps the Boeing Engineer has a point about the toxic smoke.

Perhaps there is more to this story than meets the eye? Yet they lack the expertise to do the whole aircraft in composite, and it should also be noted that the Airbus Company is building an older model with an all composite wing as a competing version. But it is happening at an alarming rate, that most people in industry try not to talk much about, there is lots of technology sharing in the Space Industry and a lot of tech spying and corporate espionage as well these days. Eventually they will have it already that is if they do not already, yes. China and Japan, russia, which can be reverse engineered by the EU, we give away much information, thus by giving them a piece, heat manufacturing process and the rest is most likely the same as the "Military" aircraft, well the composite layering.

Automotive and high-tech industries as well, like it wants the computer, remember also that China wants the US Aviation Manufacturing sector. Knowing that either way Boeing's Competition will figure it out soon enough; it is a Boeing trade secret of course. Strength and therefore huge savings in fuel, if they give them a sample then Airbus will get a jump on the building of what will become an efficiency jump in aviation airframe technology - lightweight. Should Boeing give them a sample of the composite to test?

Where the fumes killed people nearby, of course personally I have been talking about this since the first F-117 crash into a New Mexico Trailer park, carbon nano-tubes comes next and all these Dreamliners will be nothing more than nightmare if the issues with the burning and toxic fumes is not addressed, still. Which all large companies needs, that means profits, this will help them maintain their edge for a little while longer. I suppose Boeing wants to sell as many of the new Aircraft as possible in advance and then deliver them all in close proximity.

Intel and other US companies there, look what they are doing to Microsoft, after all. Can we trust the EU regulators? Airbus is in dire straights after the A-380 largest airliner in the World blunder and delays to build. Well I do not trust the EU on these things and they might try to hold up usage of these Composite Dreamliner aircraft into their airports and block thru adverse regulations in order to help the Airbus Company, as far as the trust issue.

Pet food and lead paint in the toys, fish feed, but a reality check shows that it is due to the US complaining about Toxins in the toothpaste, well they claim it is for the environment. Why? But they are only giving fines to the All-Chinese owned companies in the same region, stating that the reason is due to pollution, mostly those with huge foreign investment, as they have ordered the closing of 400 companies, a similar scenario is going on in China. And it is obvious that the EU regulators are attacking US Companies in order to propel their companies into our markets to give them an edge, we have a severe trade war afloat right now.

Meaning we need US Trade Negotiators to go in and make a deal and that takes time and means we have to give up something in some other industry, means they can hold up the sales of that aircraft for 1.5 to 3 years, merely entering that testing process, still? Which is hard to say when you douse it with Kerosene and torch it at a high temperature - then Boeing should not be so upset with allowing them a sample to burn and test, if the composite is safe.

Which should have been called the 888 if they really wanted to sell shit loads of them to China, now it looks like Boeing may be called to the carpet for the materials of it's 787, but still the EU and France with Airbus has their own issues with the A-380 financial fiasco, we are to blame too. Rather than surviving from strength, from a sedimentary life style, then eventually they die, as we create monopolies and prop up old dying industry so they do not have to innovate and adapt like other firms, of course we have our own skeletons here, the US would clobber all other nations, if there were. There are no free markets in reality, but trade works that way in the real world, it is all very silly I know, yes.

Lance, sincerely. Events occur and controversy arises as we enter the new Jet Age of high-performance materials in our dream machines - the future is now, there are more questions to be asked now that the drama continues, still. While I was in it, i would and would love to see a barrel roll on its first test flight, certainly. Would I fly on a new Boeing Dreamliner?